Decision-making under supply disruption in public-sector organisations
Dr Riley Research · 10 planned minutes · ethics D26/123
Completes
42 / 30
100% of target
Invited
103
cap 180
Minutes debited
424
4 flagged as speeders
Donations earned
$150
$5 each, cost code GRANT-2026-017
Run the pipeline
Demo controls: these run the real matcher and callback code against synthetic members- The wave sizes itself from the target, open invitations and donation budget, selects and ranks eligible members, and sends.
- Simulating responses walks invited members through Start, the survey and the completion callback, with realistic timings.
- Each completion debits planned minutes from the member’s pledge and records a donation to their chosen charity.
Invitations
| sent | 56 |
| completed | 42 |
| screened out | 4 |
| declined | 1 |
Who the study asks for
- industry is Health Care and Social Assistance or Education and Training or Public Administration and Safety
- role level is manager or senior manager or executive
A 10-minute survey about how managers in health, education and public administration decide when supplies run short.
Survey tool: the built-in demo survey
Donations: what finance sees
| Charity | Responses | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Demo University Foundation Hardship Fund | 13 | $65 |
| Women's Refuge | 5 | $25 |
| Youthline | 5 | $25 |
| Red Cross | 4 | $20 |
| Forest & Bird | 3 | $15 |
| Total to cost code GRANT-2026-017 | 30 | $150 |
Budget cap $150; 0 more completes can be funded. Reversed so far: $0. Statemented monthly; the institution is the donor of record.
Donations: what the researcher sees
| Demo University Foundation Hardship Fund | 13 | $65 |
| Women's Refuge | 5 | $25 |
| Youthline | 5 | $25 |
| Other charities | 7 | $35 |
Charities with fewer than 5 responses are folded into “other”, and no response is ever linked to a charity choice.